1.Ewoldsen N, Demke RS. A review of orthodontic cements and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:45-8.

2.Millett DT, Hallgren A, Fornell AC, Robertson M. Bonded molar tubes: A retrospective evaluation of clinical performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:667-74.

3.Norris SD. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride releasing cements. Am J Orthod 1982;86:206-11

4.McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-9.

5.Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Part 2: Clinical aspects. Dent Update 1996;23:12-6.

6.Valk JW, Davidson CL. The relevance of controlled fluoride release with bonded orthodontic appliances. J Dent 1987;15:257-60.

7.Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Salivary fluoride concentrations in children with glass ionomer cemented orthodontic appliances. Caries Res 1990;24:239-41.

8.Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:381-4.

9.Cook PA, Youngson CC. A fluoride-containing composite resin – An in vitro study of a new material for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1989;16:207-12.

10.Chan DC, Swift EJ Jr, Bishara SE. In vitro evaluation of a fluoridereleasing orthodontic resin. J Dent Res 1990;69:1576-9.

11.Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:357-61.

12.Compton AM, Meyers CE Jr, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer and a chemically cured glass ionomer for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:138-44.

13.McCarthy MF, Hondrum SO. Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:135-41.

14.Komori A, Kojima I. Evaluation of a new 2-paste glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:649-52.

15.Millett DT, Cummings A, Letters S, Roger E, Love J. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? – An in vitro evaluation. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:609-14.

16.Herion T, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Three cements used for orthodontic banding of porcelain molars. Angle Orthod 2007;77:94-9.

17.Uysal T, Ramoglu SI, Ertas H, Ulker M. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:534-9.

18.Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: Composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:36-42.

19.Jost-Brinkmann PG, Böhme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:243-53.

20.Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:472-6.

21.Wendl B, Droschl H. A comparative in vitro study of the strength of directly bonded brackets using different curing techniques. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:535-44.

22.Fischman SA, Tinanoff N. The effect of acid and fluoride release on the antimicrobial properties of four glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:368-70.

23.Mota SM, Enoki C, Ito IY, Elias AM, Matsumoto MA. Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement or resin-based composite. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:55-60.

24.Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:490-4.

25.Boruziniat A, Gharaei S. Bond strength between composite resin and modified glass ionomer using different adhesive systems and curing techniques. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:150-4.

26.Zoergiebel J, Ilie N. An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin. Acta Biomater 2013;9:9529-37.

27.El Wakeel AM, Elkassas DW, Yousry MM. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study. Eur J Dent 2015;9:176-82.